"Both my sons tell me they are not going to do it," Starr is quoted by WENN as saying. Ah well, perhaps that’s for the best. While the notion of a McCartney, a Lennon, a Harrison and a Starr (or two) on stage would have been concert promoter’s dream, some things look better on paper. A legacy like that of the Beatles must be handled with care.
Beatles blamed for drug use in Russia
Beatles poster sells for $40K
Paul McCartney himself admitted such a thing when he revealed to Rolling Stone earlier this year that although the Beatles considered reforming while they were all still alive, they decided against it lest they cast a pall on their own past.
“There was talk of reforming the Beatles a couple of times, but it didn't gel, there was not enough passion behind the idea. More importantly, it could have spoiled the whole idea of the Beatles, so wrong that they'd be like, 'Oh, my God, they weren't any good,'” McCartney told Rolling Stone.
We’ll content ourselves anticipating McCartney’s appearance at the opening ceremony of the London Summer Olympics next month.
Of course there’s more!
AC/DC wine (hick!) heading to these shores
Duran Duran-er promises juicy memoir
Stones meeting to discuss tour, record
Marilyn Manson, TV star?
Ozzy cancels show at 11th hour amid 'vocal issues’
Feuding rockers kiss and make up
Nickelback brushes off the haters
Well that's good news because their sons don't have even a fraction of the talent their fathers have and would be riding their fathers coat-tails and parasitically leeching off their legacy.
And for them to come up with this exploitative stupid idea, they also don't have the ethics, morals or musical standards their fathers do either.
Leave the Beatles legacy alone. Does everything in this world have to be exploited with no shame?
Posted by: John | 06/29/2012 at 02:04 AM